Sunday, November 23, 2008

Photojournalism

From the BBC's webpage titled "Week in pictures", we examine this picture with the following caption: "Coffins of Kurdish victims of former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's regime during the 1980s stand at the airport in Irbil, after their repatriation from a site near the southern city of Najaf."

So what does this picture say then? My impression is that its about the coffins more than anything else (obviously). since coffins are symbollic of death, it fittingly reflects the purpose of the photo, which was taken in such a way that it would in some essence give an idea just how many people died as a result of Saddam's regime. While the number of coffin's shown probably isn't all that there are supposed to be, the fact remains that this approach to the shot (with few people in it and the seemingly neverending rows of coffins all the way into the horizon) sought to bring out the most of its intended message despite the simplicity of the shot.

The repatriation of the coffins (and the deceased in them) is symbollic also in the sense that it metaphorically and literally illustrates that the past (and its atrocities) are being buried and laid to rest, and as such provide a form of resolution to the suffering of the people both deceased and alive.

Mmmm-Masterwork


Ok. So i was supposed to comment on a surrealist masterwork. and not knowing many surrealists, i (very obviously) chose to do something based on Dali's piece " La persistencia de la memoria" (aka The Persistence of Memory, Melting Clocks, Soft Watches and Droopy Watches ). Perhaps because surrealism by nature makes people go "huh?", there was a need to put an almost-literal title to the pieces to immediately give people the idea of what the painter is trying to portray.

So what's this painting of his about then? Appears to me that from the title (and the nature of the watches illustrated in the painting, that Dali gives a literal spin to the idea that time is indeed "fluid", perhaps somewhat in reference to Einstein's Theory of Relativity. When you think about it, time in its way does "flow" in a sense. The "melted" and fluid feeling of time thus also indicates that while it is flexible, there is still a relatively fixed amount to it (like how liquids take on various shapes of their containers and yet have a fixed volume). This flexibility of time reminds me of a quote from a book i read called "Thief of Time" by Terry Pratchett. In it Pratchett speaks of the guardians of time (referred to as the History Monks) and how people have been manipulating time:
People have been messing around with time ever since they were people. Wasting it, killing it, sparing it, making it up. And they do it. People's heads were made to play with time. You watch the Procrastinators even on a quiet day. Moving time, stretching it here, compressing it there. Its a big job.

With the composition of the piture being rather empty on every side except the left (where the clocks are), it naturally brings the viewer's attention to what Dali has so strategically placed there (which obviously is the point of this painting). Having the watches / clocks set against a dark background (of what appears to be the ground), they stand out even more in the picture. And thus ends the commentary on a masterwork.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

The Many Sid3s of Chris Ong

Conceptual Portraiture isn't exactly the easiest of things to do. But honestly, it gets easier once an idea is in place.

“The Many Sid3s (sides) of Chris Ong” is a series of conceptual photographs that explores and illustrates the identity of the model.

Using the word “sides” in both a literal sense (through the various profile shots) as well as the figurative (since each of us has many different sides to our personalities), it seeks to provide an insight to the model’s own self-perception as well as how he is perceived by others.

“3l3m3ntal Id3ntity” (Elemental Identity) is a piece on the various “elements” that are most recognisable about the model.

“A Qu3stion of B3li3f” (A question of Belief) is a double-meaninged piece on the model’s faith (through the sense of questioning / challenging belief, as well as in the sense of whether you believe).

“G33k Lit” (Geek Lit or “Literature”) is a piece that illustrates the reading material that the model is most associated with in terms of his technological orientation.

“Mak3 Som3 Nois3” is a piece about the model’s interest in drumming, and portrays a drumset that is both there and not there (due to its incompleteness).

“Fair Gam3” (Fair Game) reflects how much gaming is part of the model’s life, as does “Wir3d Up” (Wired Up) in symbollising his attachment to technology.

The last piece in the series, “All that you can’t l3av3 B3hind” (All that you can’t leave behind) is borrowed from a title of a song, and shows the model’s attachment to a past relationship (represented by the pig which was a gift returned), and that while he has turned his back on it, it is still a reminder to him of things gone by.

On to the pictures then:

"3l3m3ntal Id3ntity"


"A Qu3stion of B3li3f"


"G33k Lit"


"Mak3 Som3 Nois3"


"Fair Gam3"


"Wir3d Up"


"All That You Can't L3av3 B3hind"

Getting into the Mood

"No people, no animals, no mannequins". How do you portray moods then? Apparently its possible, cos you can do it like THIS:



Who / What: Where have all the flowers gone (Solitary)

Where: My house

How: Canon 1000D, ISO 200, F 5.6, 1/100s, 53mm

Why: focusing on the single white flower that stands out among the grass brings the viewer's attention specifically to it.



Who / What: Paper Chase (Activity)

Who / What: Paper Chase (Activity)

Where: My house

How: Canon 1000D, ISO 800, F 5.6, 1/20s, 55mm

Why: The close up of the papers taped to the wall and seemingly looking like they have been disturbed would give the impression that they have in some way or other been moved or disturbed to result in their current condition and position.



Who / What: Table Tangles (Chaos)

Where: My house

How: Canon 1000D, ISO 800, F 5.6, 1/20s, 55mm

Why: “Table Tangles” is an attempt at portraying the feeling of “mess”, and is illustrated through how the wires are all disorganised and tangled up together.

Thursday, October 09, 2008

Now that's Surreal (well, sort of)

Question: so what happens when you have a piece that looks about 80% there BUT you can seem to add anything to make it look better (and anything you think of adding makes it look worse)?

Ans: Go for consultation and come up with *another* prototype.

So here we have prototype 2 (duh).

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Now That's Surreal... or maybe not.

Gargh. For our next trick, we're going to learn about the various digital image manipulation techniques. First up: Photomontages and manipulation.

Your mission, if you choose to accept it, is to do a surrealist photo montage / manipulation on the theme of "Urban Fantasy" / "Urban Phenomenon" (Me: Surrealism? NOOOOOO.. i don't wanna! Anything but that!!! GARGH!!! Ed: you've got no choice kiddo. *sounds of a quarrel and scuffling*). Hang on tight... cos awaaaaaaay we go...

Chosen Technique: Photo Montage

Prototype 1:



Prototype 1A:



Tricks involved (READ: How i got the desired effect):

Both shots are (believe it or not) only essentially made up of 2 photographs. 1 of city scape (the flats) and a perspective shot of money plants (which turned into the red and green bits).

So what did i do? Well... basically if you notice, the flats in the picture are sort of warped and symetrical. So i started off with taking 1 picture and cut it in half down the middle. Got rid of the right side. Then i warped the remaining part of the pic, followed by duplicating the left and flipped horizontal (i'm a big fan of duplication and flipping). So voila, symmetrical image!

So... take that with the money plants, rinse and repeat (no warping this time though. Except that i did a little scaling instead). For that green "bear / lion" head looking thing, that was from a symmetrical duplication of the money plants (yes believe it or not). So it got scaled up to look more like a head (cool, no?).

To make things a little more interesting (and not to mention surreal), i threw on a few adjustment filters to screw around with hue and saturation. And to make all things blend well together i had vector masks utilising gradients to do blending. At that point, it was still a little too "bright" for my liking, so i thought, "hey let's throw on some rendered clouds". For 1A i decided that just for kicks i'd try a liquify effect using clockwise swirls on the flats, to give warping kind of feel. dunno if that worked well though.

aaaaannnd... that's about it really.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Focus people... FOCUS....

So right. This next assignment is supposed to be about focal length, image sensors and the like (READ: Technical aspects of photography and cameras).

So... your mission if you choose to accept it.. is to take photos to show good understanding of focal length techniques and sensor latitudes. So sit tight and hold on, because awaaaaaay we go....

Perspective



Who / What: Goodie Bags

Where: Central Forum

How: Canon 1000D; 23mm; F/5.0; 1/100 sec

Why: Shows an "almost" never-ending row of goodie bags at the central forum

Zoom Shot



Who / What: Stained Glass

Where: My House

How: Canon 1000D; 55mm; ISO 200; F/32; 1.0 sec

Why: Shows the zooming in towards the butterfly. With the focus on the butterfly giving it a sort of awe-inspiring feel.

Close Up


Who / What: Flower from Cannonball Tree

Where: Tanglin Road

How: Canon 1000D; ISO 400, F 5.6, 1/250s, 208mm

Why: The shot was taken with a 55-250 zoom lens (doesn't look like it right?) which surprisingly allowed this shot to pass off as a macro. So why is it close up? well obviously the details in the flower are visible.


High Key



Who / What: Canon EOS 350

Where: My House

How:Canon 1000D; 50mm Prime; ISO 400; f1.8; 1/4 sec

Why: A very literal and over-exposed photo which shows obvious high-key traits, while still giving the impression that the camera is being viewed through fog.

Low Key


Who / What: Cranes in Wood

Where: My House

How: Canon 1000D, ISO 800, F 1.8, 1/20s, 50mm

Why: Wooden Cranes against a "nighttime" type of backdrop of plants takes a double-play meaning on the title and images presented.


Symbollic of the Sun



Who / What: Shades

Where: My House

How: Canon 1000D; 50mm Prime; F/1.8; 1/15 sec;

Why: Sunglasses are what people usually wear to protect themselves from the sun. a destroyed and worn out pair of sungalsses also would in some sense illustrate the damaging effects of the sun.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

From Landscape to Portrait

Welcome.... to the art of shooting people (in the photographic sense of course) - Portrait shots. Now... there's 2 kinds of portrait shots - those set-up shots that you rig (the kind where you go "hey pose for me can?") as opposed to what i'd like to call the "sneaky sniper of candid moments" (the kind where your subjects go "eh why you take my picture sia? ARGH ARGH ARGH")

So... your mission if you choose to accept it, is to sneakily snipe shots of a NM class in action. and if it's good enough, you'll get it used in the department's publicity collaterals. so hang tight... cos awaaaaaaaaay we go...

Ok. So apparently the fact that there're 5 photographers shooting the class doesn't stop us from capturing candid shots of people in action



Who / What: Dr Ingrid Hoofd

Where: NM4212 Media & Representation Seminar Class

How: Canon 1000D 50mm Prime; ISO 800; F/10; 1/30 sec

Why: Shows Dr Hoofd in action observing one of the group discussions in class



Who / What: Soh Junhao (Below) and Chris Chang (top)

Where: NM4212 Media & Representation Seminar

How: Canon 1000D 50mm Prime; ISO 200; F/1.8; 1/50 sec

Why: Its an interesting shots of photographers in action (besides, someone needs to take photos of what we do for NM3223).

Monday, September 22, 2008

Exposed!

Ok. So we're moving on now to the next level - playing around with Apeture and Shutter Speed.

Since Apeture determines Depth of Field, this most probably means we're working on the different depths of field. *ding ding ding give that man a prize!* And since shutter speed determines how fast / slow the shutter opens / closes, it determines how fast we can capture something without looking blur (and not to mention without cheating using a flash). so with that out of the way.... hang tight cos awaaaaaay we go...

Shallow Depth of Field


Who / What: Dining Chair

Where: my house

How: Canon 1000D 50mm Prime; ISO 400; F/1.8; 1/25 sec

Why: Its the only object in focus, when compared to all the other chairs in the background which are totally blurred out.

Deep Depth of Field



Who / What: Fire Hydrant

Where: outside my house

How: Canon 1000D 50mm Prime; ISO 400; F/22; 1/8 sec

Why: Pretty much the entire picture is in focus, but the focus of the picture (no pun intended) is the fire hydrant. Part of that is due to the colour, because it most definitely stands out amidst everything else.

Freeze Motion



Who / What: Hot & Cold

Where: YIH & Chinese Library

How: Canon 1000D ISO 250, F 4.0, 1/400s, 28mm

Why: This is one of those fans from the air cons, which as most people know, constantly is in motion. So by right what you'd usually get is like a white circle, but since there's freeze motion, you can *almost* distinctly see the blades.

Motion Blur



Who / What: Chasing Cars

Where: bus stop at Orchard Boulevard, opposite Orchard MRT

How: Canon 1000D 50mm Prime; ISO 400; F/22; 1/5

Why: The bus stop is just a little after the traffic light, so the cars will definitely be moving very fast because of the acceleration. The slow shutter speed manages to catch one car entering and another exiting.

The 5 Elements

Ok so its not quite Earth, Fire, Wind, Water and Metal. More like Line, Shape, Form, Colour and Texture (this IS photography after all).

So... your mission if you choose to accept it, involves taking pictures of the above-mentioned 5 elements (the photography ones that is). Restriction is that it has to be within NUS campus. Sounds simple enough? Right then. and awaaaaaay we go...

Line



Who / What: Wiring from laptops and extension cable

Where: AS6 Walkway

How: Canon 1000D 50mm Prime; ISO 400; F/2.0; 1/20 sec

Why: Shows organic lines (not straight and rigid)

Shape



Who / What: Laptop keyboard

Where: AS6 Walkway

How: Canon 1000D 50mm Prime; ISO 400; F/2.0; 1/20 sec

Why: a very squarish / rectangular photo featuring a lot of similar shapes (right down from the laptop to the individual keys)

Form



Who / What: One of those takeaway coffee cups from the Arts Canteen

Where: AS6 Walkway

How: Canon 1000D; 50mm Prime; ISO 400; F/2.5; 1/125 sec

Why: Its cylindrical, its big, it definitely looks 3D (which is what form items are supposed to look like right?)

Colour



Who / What: Frog Soft Toy

Where: AS6 Walkway

How: Canon 1000D; 50mm Prime; ISO 400; F/1.8; 1/20 sec

Why: in a world of very dull and dark colours (like brown and black), a bright green soft toy most definitely stands out.

Texture



Who / What: One of those benches along AS6 Walkway

Where: AS6 Walkway

How: Canon 1000D; 50mm Prime; ISO 400; F/1.8; 1/60 sec

Why: Its an uneven, scratchy and dare i say paint-peeling surface. Surely that's a texture with age and CHARACTER?

Friday, August 15, 2008

Say something about what you see.

I was asked to comment on photos from the following:

1. World Press Photo of the Year

2. International Photographic Art Prize "Arte Laguna"

3. Digital Camera Photographer of the Year

And probably one of the first questions i asked myself was this: "What makes a good photo?" since obviously people thought that these photos were good enough to win prizes in their own categories.

It could be said that the following criteria would apply when examining photos:

1. aesthetics (composition / lighting/ contrast)
2. portrayal of a message / story
3. impact

So how does this apply to the photos from the following sites? There's 2 ways of looking at it - individually and collectively. Obviously in the collective sense they would have had to meet the criteria to even warrant being considered, so the question then is what separates the best from the better and the good?

Let's take this picture as an example. Based on comments by the judges who thought that "this was a clear winner, despite the harrowing nature of the image. The photo almost defies belief. It’s also helped by clear, simple lighting and composition. What this does demonstrate is how a good, simple treatment of such a remarkable subject can still produce a memorable image."

Obviously in this case what they were looking for was more a case of impact and composition being of greater importance. Of course there's still a message behind it and it does tell a story (because i think all 3 aspects are something inherent in pictures), but the thing in this case is that the focus is very obviously on 2 of these aspects.

For another example, let's consider this picture. According to the site it was the "World Press Photo of the Year" for 2007, ahead of other photos in the different categories (which had their own winners of course but didn't make it for the big one).

So why did it win? Probably because in the case of this award, it was the aspect of the story / message that was important (the competition is for press photos after all, and they're supposed to tell a story of sorts).

Finally, let's consider this one. This one would seem to have its judging criteria based solely on the aesthetic aspects such as composition, lighting and techniques involved for digital manipulation. There isn't much of a message behind it, and impact-wise, somehow it doesn't quite measure up against the other 2.

So from looking at all 3 competitions and their winning entries, what do we learn? That basically, what makes a "good photo" varies. The intention of the photographer at that moment does play a part in the end result, because it will affect all 3 criteria mentioned earlier, and it does show through the pictures.

Monday, February 25, 2008

Monday, February 18, 2008

That Darn Assignment Part Trio

Interesting comment in my IVLE upload: 14 people commmented on my blog. Is that a good enough excuse to be later than 6.30pm?

So here's my response to the 14 comments individually. For a general one, please view the comments in Part Deux.

“I think you have a great storyline going on. The pictures in the beginning showed sadness (the letters, gifts, when were depressed). However i think the rest of your pictures didn't really portray it clearly enough? Were your pictures supposed to express loneliness?

Plus i realised that your pictures didn't contain any people in it. Is there a reason for it? Personally for me, i feel that one of the ways to express loneliness in a person is to take the picture of a person who looks lonely. Eg. a person sitting on a bench, or a person reading a book on his own? Basically, taking pictures of single people doing some form of activity on their own. =)” (Rebecca Oh)

Good point on that. However the intention was that these places where I used to go are now empty because… well, I’m alone.

I think it's because these are specific memories shared by you and your ex. So to the rest of us we don't see much relevance of it to us.

I suggest you could 'hire' a girl to act as your ex? Like you two can sit on the benches together in one pic, perhaps in black & white, and then in the next pic, in color, the bench is empty. Think the feel of sadness would be stronger. :) (Anonymous)

Spot on with that one. Gotta remember that I’m making it for other people, not just myself.

“Hi Chris, I like your idea of finishing the video off with a scene similar to the opener. However, I feel that to make the whole thing appears as 1 session of reminiscing, you should start off with your character staring into space and perhaps end with someone else shaking your character out of his daydreams.

Also, I agree with what Rebecca said. To portray loneliness, the best way will be to show a person being alone. In the pictures that showed at the end, I could only see various items/scenes and they do not seem to express any meaning.

Perhaps you could add people into the video? That would add a human touch and create empathy.” (Xueli)

Good point. That means there’s an obvious problem there. The pictures aren’t tell the story correctly. I’ll need to do something about that – better pictures or different pictures.

“Hi, I thought that probably you could have some text or some description going on at the beginning of the clip so that one could understand your video right from the start? Cause actually i didnt really understand the story in the beginning. but, nice song =)” (Anonymous)

Ok that sounds bad. The fact that you couldn’t understand the starting bit means there’s really a problem with it somewhere. I thought that of the whole video, that part would have been the most self-explanatory.

“Chris~ I don't like the music and then the narrative part butts in like the video you provided. It's distracting. May be you wanna narrate with the background music altogether? Contradictory to what Rebecca feels I think the empty spaces works out fine for your part. I could sense it. Someone commented on using an actress... I don't think you will do it right. And I would say not to use it. It's bad and the other is it's like the aftermath of a broken relationship so don't think you should include. And I guess what you want to portray is the emptiness more than recalling the good old times aye?” (Su Pei)

You’re spot on with that bit. But I dunno if the video is achieving that aim considering the other feedback I’m getting. Seems like intention differs from perception.

“Similar to what the rest have commented, I do not really get the feel of loneliness you are trying to portray. Especially the series of the benches pictures.

Perhaps you could get some one to pose as your gf and you sitting at the benches Followed by the next scene is her gradually fading away. Guess that will portray a better feel of loneliness and sadness.

In addition, i feel that currently your .mov has a lack of human touch, is very cold. Just a suggestion here, instead of ending the story with two paragraphs, you could narrate yourself. I believe this will make your .mov more meaningful and touching especially if you can narrate it with a sense of sadness” (Anonymous)

1. Ok that one, personally I thought was a bit of an issue as well. But I wanted them empty. Maybe need to portray better.

2. Really? That wasn’t the intention (but probably the perception). Might need to work on that. Then again this video is about painful memories of what was. So cold may not be such a bad perspective.

3. Narrating is definitely an option I think. I need to toy around with the idea more. Just that I thought it was more impactful for people to read. Maybe read AND narrate?

“I like the idea of your story because it's very different. Pictures wise, I am able to get the story in the beginning. I think the song played a huge role in telling your story:)May I know where did you get your song from? Perhaps you could let the music fate into silence than having it shut off all of a sudden.” (Ting)

Hmm that’s good. But if its only at the beginning then it doesn’t achieve the purpose because then after that if no one gets it then it doesn’t work.

Unfortunately the song won’t be appearing in the final. It’s just a placeholder. Though I really did feel that it was extremely apt.


“Although I think both ideas work, i.e. with or without actors, I say the choice is yours, I quite get the sepia transitions hmm but perhaps you could desaturate the photos at the second part to look sadder.

Also, I think that for some of the shots theres a odd black space, which are interweaved with the photos that are full screen, to me if feels just a little odd, maybe if u could put all the photos full screen or separate the two?” (Mark)

Hmm… well all the photos were just thrown in “as is”, no touch ups. So might need to do a bit of that. That might help achieve the desired effect

The space comes as a result of having portrait photos which don’t occupy the whole screen. The only way to fix that is either use all landscape pics, or zoom in. Need to play around with that a bit more.

“I can feel the sadness in your video. And i think without the girl charcter would be better. Does the empty spaces hold some memories to you? That's how I interpret the empty spaces and I think it works fine. The song is also nicely fit with the theme of your story.” (Rash)

Thanks so much Rash! And yeah that was the point of the empty spaces.

“Hey i think the music is nice, but convey a feeling of missing someone.. instead of the anger you tried to portray last week at Valentines Day... Perhaps the visuals can focus more about the end of a relationship, so that we can see the story better, and feel for the character better, instead of items that symbolizes the relationship, because it may not be known to the audience. =)” (Ozeona)

Well… I wasn’t exactly trying to portray anger I guess. While its true that I detest V-Day, the aim was always more about remembering what was. And even then it wasn’t supposed to be the happy type of reminiscing.

Point taken. Might need to work on that.

“I thought that your song is a little unsuitable cuz i was expecting something like a really sad, sad song. Also, I think there should be some shots of you interacting with the inanimate objects, like looking at the letter, with your chin resting on the table and sadness in your eyes?

But other than that i guess you story is working out well.” (Hui Ting)

That’s an interesting suggestion. There’s going to be a little of that at the end I guess. But maybe need to put more.

“Hey chris, i would say a good effort for a draft. The song fits the whole feel of the video in terms of its lyrics. The words at the end aptly summarizes your video. Which is a bittersweet kind of a first love experience.

However in terms of retaining attention and capturing my eyeballs : ) it din fare as good. It felt a little monotonous towards the middle and the reason for the monotony was that there were essentially only 2 types of photos. 1, letters and stuff that she gave you. 2, places which the both of you have gone before. You could try exploring using words and blank spaces to bring variety into the video.

: ) cheers mate” (Sam)

Now THAT’s what I call feedback. Haha. Good point about the monotony. Probably need to cull some pictures and replace others.

“i feel you need a bit of text to explain some of the photos. otherwise, i feel you will have to finish the entire video to get to know what do the photos mean in the beginning...

and also i saw the video ending... but the music just cuts off... not sure if it's just on my platform. maybe you wanna check and fine-tune that part?” (Jasmine)

Isn’t that technically the point? That you should watch the whole thing? But I can see where you’re coming from, on the assumption that not everyone can catch it right from the start. I’m thinking narration MIGHT be better than text, but that needs people to concentrate more. And if they miss it then that’s problematic.

“Hi Chris:

You can consider to have the song lyrics to display when you showcase the video. But knowing that we need royalty free music it will be tough.

Otherwise words would be good to have so that audience can understand the video better.

Are the quotes by you? You can consider putting like the opening and closing like " ".

Great work!” (Katherine)

Thanks Katherine. Truth be told, the quote is actually from a movie I watched (also about broken relationships).

p.s. Apologies to Jasmine if my reply came across as being a bit on the harsh side.

Sunday, February 17, 2008

That Darn Assignment Part Deux

Hmm ok. Now for part 2 of this (READ: The Update)

So i've actually got some new photos added in (be prepared for another video with the same annoying background music). HOWEVER, i've also stumbled upon another great idea - based on something i watched on Star Sports the other day. I'm thinking of following the background music dispersed with narration format. Comments please *grin*

Anyway, that aside, here's the latest version of the video. It includes other places outside of school. I also intend to finish it off with a scene similar to the opener (so that the whole thing appears as 1 session of reminiscing).

p.s. if anyone needs inspiration check out this video and this one too. Its REALLY good (not to mention being my inspiration for my assignment - in terms of approach, not topic).

Tip: Press the play, then press pause to let it load. Go to someone else's blog to do your commenting and come back when its done (but don't forget to come back!)


That Darned assignment...

Ok. Truth be told, i detest V-day. I really do. That's why this assignment was so darn hard to do. But i figured out something in the end, controversial as it seems.

The low-down: do a 2 1/2 to 4 min photo slideshow on the theme of love, valentine's day, romance etc.

Requirements: make sure its your own photos (simple enough) and royalty-free music (dang!). oh and make sure there's a storyline.

So... i figured... why not do broken relationships (hence the controversy)? considering how everyone else would probably be doing those normal, happy type of stuff. so... i present... my assignment draft for this photo slideshow

Since i'm at it... why not the video draft too?

(please note that the song in the background ISN'T the actual music. Blessid Union of Souls' "Light in your eyes" was used as a placeholder of sorts... to see if i could find something with the same type of "feel" to get the same effect.)

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

So the story goes...

The challenge: grab as many pics as possible for a story, format them to a certain size and resolution, and stuff 'em onto a webpage and make sure it doesn't exceed 180kb. Sounds simple enough? WRONG!

Its perfectly fine when all your content added together hits 180kb just nicely, but is weird when your folder says you've got 320kb (what gives?). Apparently, its due to the thumbnail saving function (which produced a file that was almost as large as the folder it


So what did i learn then?

1. Hidden files like thumbnail files can be a real pain when you're tight on disk space. Best to disable it.

2. If you're doing something requiring pictures, make sure you take lots of them so that there's a good archive to work with

3. Cropping pics for perspective and focus helps get the message across

4. Anything is possible. Even at the last minute.

So to see the story for yourself, check out the pics below (from left to right then down).

[ed: another lesson also is that blogger can sometimes screw around with what you put in the post. on the blog itself all the pictures just appear as a single roll[















Sunday, February 10, 2008

Now That's Surreal...

Poster for a theatre production with the theme of surrealism... now that's tough. Cos first you need to figure out the storyline to be reflected in the poster, then you need to make it fit the theme of surrealism.

according to wikipedia: "[the works] feature the element of surprise, unexpected juxtapositions and non sequitr."

according to dictionary.com: "a style of art and literature developed principally in the 20th century, stressing the subconscious or nonrational significance of imagery arrived at by automatism or the exploitation of chance effects, unexpected juxtapositions, etc."

So... it has to look fantasy / unreal / out of this world. Doesn't seem to hard right? WRONG.

So what i settled for was something along the lines of a "what if", since the play is about dreams and sacrifice after all. So...




Now... as a first draft this is fine. EXCEPT that after thinking about it and seeing the end product in print...

1. The details of the production don't follow typical theatre posters (so that needs to be fixed)
2. I showed it to some people and its not immediately obvious (hence making it a bad poster if i have to explain)
3. The more i stare at it i realise that the picture in the centre is the draw factor (and not the ones on the sides). I don't know if that's a good thing. On the bright side that means that people will see the title of the play right?)

So... need more tweaks.